Why not attack their points instead of attacking them?
Oh yeah, because what they're saying is the truth.
It doesn't matter what people do for a living or what your opinion is of them or their marijuana use. What matters is whether or not their arguments are sound, and they are. The science doesn't support mandatory minimums.
Submitted by Anonymous () on Tue, 06/23/2009 - 20:25.
Why not attack their points
Why not attack their points instead of attacking them?
Oh yeah, because what they're saying is the truth.
It doesn't matter what people do for a living or what your opinion is of them or their marijuana use. What matters is whether or not their arguments are sound, and they are. The science doesn't support mandatory minimums.